Your intellectual fly is open when you use an LLM to author a post (2025)
Points and comments are a snapshot, not live.
LLM-generated posts reveal obvious stylistic tells, undermining authenticity and reader trust.
The author confesses LinkedIn has become important to him, but criticizes the prevalence of LLM-generated posts. He argues LLM writing is stylistically grating with emojis, single-sentence paragraphs, and em-dashes overused. Such content is easily identifiable as AI-generated, causing readers to question authenticity. The author recommends LLMs for brainstorming, comprehension, and editing, but insists people write their own content to preserve voice and credibility.
He emphasizes that obvious AI tells make readers assume content is fabricated, harming trust. He encourages confidence in one's own voice.
What commenters are saying
Commenters largely agree with the post, sharing frustration about unedited AI slop on LinkedIn. Some question why users don't recognize the low quality. One camp sees LLM use as misleading because it attributes human thought to a machine, while others note that if LLMs improve stylistically, the main objection shifts to dishonesty. A commenter points out that the post itself contains em-dashes, suggesting hypocrisy. Many express concern that the supply of competent readers is dwindling, making detection of AI text increasingly irrelevant.