Why aren't smart people happier? (2022)
Points and comments are a snapshot, not live.
Intelligence tests measure well-defined problem-solving, not real-life happiness.
The article argues that intelligence (IQ) does not predict happiness, citing meta-analyses and the General Social Survey showing a tiny negative correlation (-0.06). The root cause is traced to Spearman's 'g' factor: tests measure skill on well-defined problems with clear rules, repeatable solutions, and indisputable answers. Life's important problems-relationships, career, meaning-are poorly defined: no stable rules, boundaries, or repeatable processes. Success in well-defined domains (chess, math) doesn't translate to poorly defined ones. Examples include high-IQ individuals like Christopher Langan and Bobby Fischer making disastrous life choices. Historical progress on well-defined problems hasn't increased happiness.
What commenters are saying
Dominant sentiment: smart people are unhappy because they are acutely aware of surrounding stupidity and horrors they cannot fix. A top comment captures this: 'you can't be tortured by thoughts you're not having, and I, sadly, am having thoughts.' There is pushback: several commenters argue that intelligence alone doesn't create happiness-discipline, humility, and wisdom matter more. One commenter cites Warren Buffett's view that a 130 IQ with rationality beats a 160 IQ without it. Another notes that top-tier intelligence (>160) is qualitatively different and can be a gift, but only if the person stays functional.