Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

385 points · 171 comments on HN · read original →

Points and comments are a snapshot, not live.

Article body wasn't reachable. The HN discussion summary is below.

What commenters are saying

Commenters focused on the model's license and performance verification criteria. One asked for benchmarks on end-to-end tokens/sec and cost in realistic coding scenarios. Two key camps emerged on open-source acceleration: one argued open models drive progress by enabling competition and research, while another saw them as deceleration since they might reduce funding for frontier labs. A top comment noted Kimi-K3 is plausibly less dangerous than proprietary models, questioning the double standard in safety concerns. The license requires separate agreements for commercial use above $20M revenue or 100M MAU.