I should have loved biology (2020)

311 points · 118 comments on HN · read original →

Points and comments are a snapshot, not live.

Biology is taught as lifeless facts, not as the wondrous, quest-driven science it is.

The author argues that biology education fails by presenting facts without the astonishment they deserve. High school biology required memorizing terms like the Golgi apparatus and Krebs cycle without conveying the wonder of embryonic differentiation or DNA as a recursive program. The article praises resources like David Goodsell's "The Machinery of Life" for giving physical intuition of cellular processes. It recommends learning methods like RNA-seq and Western blots to understand how biologists know what they know, and suggests starting with personal questions like "Why are my eyes blue?" to drive learning.

What commenters are saying

Commenters broadly agree with the critique of science education, sharing personal anecdotes about how lab classes focus on execution rather than experimental design. One commenter studied neurobiology after working as a software engineer, advocating taking breaks to study different fields. Several discuss "Gödel, Escher, Bach," noting its influence but disagreeing on its quality: some call it a mind-blowing classic, others find it self-indulgent or signaling. A few note this is a perennial HN favorite, first posted in 2020.